Attività

How Music and Instruments Began？

Music must first be defined and distinguished from speech, and from animal and bird cries. We discuss the stages of

hominid anatomy that permit music to be perceived and created, with the likelihood of both Homo neanderthalensis and Homo

sapiens both being capable. The earlier hominid ability to emit sounds of variable pitch with some meaning shows that music

at its simplest level must have predated speech. The possibilities of anthropoid motor impulse suggest that rhythm may have

preceded melody, though full control of rhythm may well not have come any earlier than the perception of music above. There

are four evident purposes for music: dance, ritual, entertainment personal, and communal, and above all social cohesion,

again on both personal and communal levels. We then proceed to how outdoor musical instrument began, with a brief survey of the surviving examples from the

Mousterian period onward, including the possible Neanderthal evidence and the extent to which they showed “artistic”

potential in other fields. We warn that our performance on replicas of surviving instruments may bear little or no

resemblance to that of the original players. We continue with how later instruments, strings, and skin-drums began and

developed into instruments we know in worldwide cultures today. The sound of music is then discussed, scales and intervals,

and the lack of any consistency of consonant tonality around the world. This is followed by iconographic evidence of the

instruments of later antiquity into the European Middle Ages, and finally, the history of public performance, again from the

possibilities of early humanity into more modern times. This paper draws the ethnomusicological perspective on the entire

development of music, instruments, and performance, from the times of H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens into those of modern

musical history, and it is written with the deliberate intention of informing readers who are without special education in

music, and providing necessary information for inquiries into the origin of music by cognitive scientists.

But even those elementary questions are a step too far, because first we have to ask “What is music?” and this is a

question that is almost impossible to answer. Your idea of music may be very different from mine, and our next-door neighbor

’s will almost certainly be different again. Each of us can only answer for ourselves.

Mine is that it is “Sound that conveys emotion.”

We can probably most of us agree that it is sound; yes, silence is a part of that sound, but can there be any music

without sound of some sort? For me, that sound has to do something—it cannot just be random noises meaning nothing. There

must be some purpose to it, so I use the phrase “that conveys emotion.” What that emotion may be is largely irrelevant to

the definition; there is an infinite range of possibilities. An obvious one is pleasure. But equally another could be fear or

revulsion.

How do we distinguish that sound from speech, for speech can also convey emotion? It would seem that musical sound must

have some sort of controlled variation of pitch, controlled because speech can also vary in pitch, especially when under

overt emotion. So music should also have some element of rhythm, at least of pattern. But so has the recital of a sonnet, and

this is why I said above that the question of “What is music?” is impossible to answer. Perhaps the answer is that each of

us in our own way can say “Yes, this is music,” and “No, that is speech.”